Seabiscuit+Discussion+Questions

Please respond thoughtfully to the following questions in full, developed paragraphs. Your answers should reflect comprehension of the film //Seabiscuit// and connections to background knowledge.

> >
 * 1) In light of our discussion on examining society through sports, how do the story of Seabiscuit and the sport of horseracing during the 1930s help us analyze the behavior, values, and culture of Americans?
 * 1) What evidence of social tension did the film present? Provide three specific examples.
 * 1) What thoughtful connections can you make between your previous content knowledge of the Great Depression and the information presented in the film? How did the film add to your understanding of American society during the 1930s?

Rubric for Online Responses You are expected to post a substantive responses to the posted questions designed to help you analyze and digest your readings and movie experiences. A substantive response is one that is 75 to 100 words in length. Your responses will be graded using the following rubric. Points A   The response answers the posted question thoroughly. The author presents a clear rationale for his or her views. The author demonstrates a deep understanding of the cultural connections to Sports History. The response is well written. B   The response is fairly complete. The author’s rationale for his or her views is mostly well reasoned. The author demonstrates a solid understanding of the cultural connections to Sports History. The response is well written. C   The response is fairly complete. The author’s rationale for his or her views is mostly well reasoned. The author has mostly understood the cultural connections to Sports History. The response is well written. D   The response is incomplete. The author’s rationale for his or her views is only somewhat well reasoned. The author demonstrates limited understanding of the cultural connections to Sports History. The response is poorly written. F   The response is incomplete. The author’s rationale for his or her view is not presented. The author demonstrates limited understanding of the cultural connections to Sports History. The response is poorly written. 0   No response posted.